- Glitches in the Gaydar
- Posts
- High Camp, Low Stakes, Zero Heterosexual Energy: A Batman Sequel for the Girls and the Gays
High Camp, Low Stakes, Zero Heterosexual Energy: A Batman Sequel for the Girls and the Gays
Or How Batman & Robin Gave Us a Queer Identity Crisis in 125 Minutes
If Batman Forever was the gay awakening, Batman & Robin was the full-blown identity crisis. Neon chaos. Ice puns. Codpieces that made you question your whole existence. Joel Schumacher didn’t just go camp—he went full queer opera.
“I want a car. Chicks dig the car.”
Let’s start with the suits. The infamous nipples? Still controversial. Still iconic. On Robin, they were less “design choice” and more “emergency broadcast signal for baby gays.” And the codpiece? You could see it from space. Sculpted. Framed. Glorious. Subtle? Never. You weren’t watching for the plot. You were watching Chris O’Donnell’s pelvic silhouette and quietly spiralling.
They zoomed in on butts. On pecs. On thighs. It was a thirst trap before Instagram existed. And every time someone says “suit up,” I still picture Robin in full latex, turning dramatically, glutes glistening.
“I hate to disappoint you, but rubber lips are immune to your charms.”
And let’s talk dynamics. Robin spends the entire movie in a romantic jealousy spiral because Batman won’t let him drive the car. The energy? Unhinged ex-boyfriend. Their arguments are basically couple therapy sessions. Their makeups are tender. The tension is… palpable.
Through it all, Robin is moody, dramatic, and desperate for Batman’s approval. He’s not a sidekick. He’s a gay theatre kid in a crime-fighting situationship.
“A poison kiss? You don't understand. She understands how I feel.”
Looking back, Batman & Robin wasn’t just camp—it was glittery queer resistance in a batsuit. It defied every rule of the gritty, masculine superhero genre and replaced it with leather, neon, and sexual tension so thick you could slice it with a batarang. It wasn’t trying to blend in. It was yelling “LOOK AT ME” in rhinestones and rubber. And we did. Oh, we did.
It was a soft-core fever dream masquerading as family entertainment—a film so drenched in homoerotic angst and theatrical absurdity that it stopped being a movie and became a vibe. We didn’t always know what it meant at the time. But our bodies understood. Our gay little hearts took one look at Chris O’Donnell’s sculpted suit and said, “Yes. This. Whatever this is.” We felt confused. We felt awakened. We felt seen.
Editor’s Note (Before You Come for Me):
Yes, I know. Uma Thurman’s Poison Ivy is iconic. She deserved more than a passing mention in this article—and she’s getting it. Trust me. Her own goddamn feature is coming, because that camp-couture eco-terrorist deserves nothing less than a standalone shrine. Stay tuned.
Reply